NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Zepinic v Attorney-General of NSW [2023] NSWSC 785 Hearing dates: 19 April 2023 Date of orders: 7 July 2023 Decision date: 07 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: (1) The defendant's summons filed 14 December 2021 is dismissed. (2) The plaintiff is to pay the first and second defendant's costs. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – Appeal from NCAT – reinstatement order – psychologist's registration – abuse of process – summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 9 and 10 Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW) s 105 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) s 8 Health Practitioner Regulation National Law 2009 (NSW) s 3, 5, 23, 25, 149, 163, 163B, 287 and Schedule 4 and 5A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) rr 6.1, 6.10, 13.4, 14.28, 59.10 and 163B Psychologists Act 2001 (NSW) (now repealed) s 17, 24, 25, 53, 83 and 111 Cases Cited: B v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 599; [1992] HCA 68 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245; [1995] HCA 10 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 937 Campbell v R [2007] 2 Cr App Rep 28 DS v HM Advocate (2007) SC (PC) 1 Global Partners Fund v Babcock v Brown Ltd (In liq) (2010) 267 ALR 144 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590; [1989] HCA 50 Hassan v Sydney Local Health District [2022] NSWSC 954 Hulme v Hulme [2023] NSWSC 299 Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67 Kitoko v New South Wales [2021] NSWSC 545 Makin v Attorney-General (1989) 167 CLR 590; [1984] AC 57 O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26 Pfennig v The Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461; [1995] HCA 7 R v Fouad Bennabou [2012] EWCA Crim 3088 R v Ghosh [1982] 2 All ER 689 R v Hanson, Gilmore & Pickstone [2005] 2 Crim App R 21 R v Highton [2005] 1 WLR 3472 Regina v Boardman [1975] AC 421 Sunol v Collier (2012) 81 NSWLR 619; [2012] NSWCA 14 Vito Zepinic v Healthcare Complaints Commission [2020] NSWSC 13 Z v Mental Health Review Tribunal (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 131 Zaidi v Health Care Complaints Commission (1998) 44 NSWLR 82 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Australia) Limited [2016] NSWCA 30 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWCA 146 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2018] NSWCATOD 166 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 320 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission (No 3) [2021] NSWCA 25 Zepinic v Health Care Complaints Commission [2020] NSWSC 13 Zepinic v Psychologists Registration Board of New South Wales [2010] NSWPST 6 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vito Zepinic (Plaintiff) Attorney General of NSW (First Defendant) Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Plaintiff) R.A. McEwen (First Defendant) P. Lowson (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate