NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Shuk [2023] NSWSC 788 Hearing dates: 6 July 2023 Date of orders: 7 July 2023 Decision date: 07 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Basten AJ Decision: (1) Set aside the decision of the member of the Personal Injury Commission dated 21 December 2022 in matter No M10472665/21 and set aside the Certificate issued under s 7.36(4) of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 with respect to the decision. (2) Remit the miscellaneous claims assessment to the Commission for reconsideration by the Commission constituted by a different member. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – error of law on face of record – assessment of culpability for motor accident – cessation of statutory benefits – failure to apply correct legal principles – factual finding without evidence – whether material – whether finding of contributory negligence manifestly unreasonable TORTS – negligence – contributory negligence – motor vehicle colliding with pedestrian – whether contributory negligence greater than 61% - application of Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW), s 3.11 Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5R Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW), ss 1.4, 3.11, 3.38 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 75A Cases Cited: Anikin v Sierra (2004) 79 ALJR 452; [2004] HCA 64 Boral Bricks Pty Ltd v Cosmidis (No 2) (2014) 86 NSWLR 393; [2014] NSWCA 139 Derrick v Cheung [2001] HCA 48; (2001) 181 ALR 301 Manley v Alexander (2005) 80 ALJR 413; [2005] HCA 79 Mobbs v Kain [2009] NSWCA 301; 54 MVR 179 T and X Company Pty Ltd v Chivas [2014] NSWCA 235; 67 MVR 297 Texts Cited: M Aronson, M Groves and G Weeks, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (7th ed, Lawbook Co, 2022) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited ABN 15000122850 (Plaintiff) Shuveccha Islam Shuk (First Defendant) President, Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Catsanos SC (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate