NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Biggers [2023] NSWSC 790 Hearing dates: 03 July 2023 Date of orders: 07 July 2023 Decision date: 07 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: (1) Pursuant to ss 5B and 9(1)(a) of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant is subject to an extended supervision order for a period of three years. (2) Pursuant to s 11 of the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), the defendant, for the period of the extended supervision order, is to comply with the Conditions set out in Annexure A to this judgment. Catchwords: HIGH RISK OFFENDER – final hearing – extended supervision order – child sexual offences – whether unacceptable risk of committing a serious offence – extended supervision order not opposed by defendant – length of supervision order not opposed – dispute limited to some of the conditions – extended supervision order imposed – some conditions adjusted to accommodate potential requirements of employment – rehabilitation of offender whilst bearing in mind the primary object of safety and protection of the community Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: State of New South Wales v Biggers (Preliminary) [2023] NSWSC 367 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Philip Peter Biggers (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: K Ng (Plaintiff) R Webb (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate