NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jaghbir v R [2023] NSWCCA 175 Hearing dates: 31 October 2022 Decision date: 12 July 2023 Before: Button J at [1]; McNaughton J at [201]; R A Hulme AJ at [205] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted (2) Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – judge alone trial – accessory before the fact to murder – where deceased fatally shot by unknown intruders while asleep in apartment – where intruders entered apartment by unlocking front door with copied key in their possession – circumstantial case – finding that the applicant had provided the copied key to the intruders disputed – whether the verdict was unreasonable – whether Crown was obliged to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a named person had been one of the principal offenders– open to trial judge to return verdict of guilty – identification of particular person as one of the perpetrators not an indispensable intermediate fact – no requirement for identity of principal offender to be proven beyond reasonable doubt – sufficient that applicant believed person had been involved in the murder – leave to appeal granted – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 346 Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic) s 62 Cases Cited: Burrell v The Queen [2009] NSWCCA 163 Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; [1984] HCA 7 Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Giorgianni v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 473; [1985] HCA 29 Humphries v R [2015] NSWCCA 319 King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423; [1986] HCA 59 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 R v Botrus (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 1449 R v Davidson [2009] NSWCCA 150 R v Jaghbir (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1383 R v Merritt (1999) NSWCCA 29 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573; [1990] HCA 56 Slattery v R [2023] NSWCCA 117 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ahmed Jaghbir (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC, P Lange, and E James (Applicant) M Millward (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate