Tukel v Combat Sports Authority [2023] NSWCATAD 180

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tukel v Combat Sports Authority [2023] NSWCATAD 180 Hearing dates: 26 and 27 July 2022 Date of orders: 12 July 2023 Decision date: 12 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: T Simon, Principal Member Decision: (1) The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: COMBAT SPORTS ACT– boxing –– trainer – second – fit and proper person Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act (NSW) 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Combat Sports Act 2013 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Tukel v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 104 NSW Police Force v Bazzi [2021] NSWSC 1150 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fidel Tukel (Applicant) Combat Sports Authority (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel G Stanton (Applicant) K Pham (First and Second Respondents)

Solicitors Cunningham Solicitors (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (First and Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00106186 Publication restriction: 1. Pursuant to s. 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the publication of any evidence given during confidential hearing sessions or in the confidential information, is prohibited without further order of the Tribunal. 2. Pursuant to s. 64(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the disclosure to the applicant, the legal representative for the applicant of any evidence given during the confidential sessions or in confidential information is prohibited without further order of the Tribunal. 3. Pursuant to s. 64(1)(d) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the disclosure to the first respondent of any evidence given during the confidential hearing sessions with the second respondents or in confidential information, from which they were excluded, is prohibited without further order of the Tribunal. 4. Pursuant to ss. 64(1)(b) and 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013, the publication and reporting of the private hearing, including any oral evidence given during the private hearing, is prohibited without further order of the Tribunal. 5. Those paragraphs of these reasons identified as "not for publication" are not to be released, other than to the respondents, without further order of the Tribunal.