NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Re Estate Buxton; Knoll v Buxton [2023] NSWSC 819 Hearing dates: 1 - 5 May 2023 and written submissions Decision date: 17 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Lindsay J Decision: (1) Competing claims to beneficial ownership of three properties, as between a de facto wife and the deceased estate of her de facto husband, subsumed in family provision orders to be made in favour of the wife under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 NSW. (2) An estoppel claim against the wife and the estate of the husband by a young couple for whom one of the properties was bought in the name of the wife for the benefit of the young couple upheld on terms. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family Provision – Claim by member of household for provision from deceased's estate – Where former de facto partner claims entitlement to family provision as a dependent member of deceased's household – Where no provision made for partner in deceased's will – Where competing claims made by partner and estate as to beneficial ownership of three properties – Whether partner not left with adequate provision for proper maintenance, education and advancement in life – Order for provision made, subject to adjustment orders. EQUITY – Estoppel – Proprietary estoppel – Detrimental reliance – Common intention trust – Where parties agreed on purchase of a property in the name of one for the benefit of others – Where others claim beneficial ownership of property on terms – Relief granted on terms. Legislation Cited: Family Law Act 1975 Cth Interpretation Act 1987 NSW Succession Act 2006 NSW Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656 Bassett v Bassett [2021] NSWCA 320 Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [1938] AC 463 Clayton v Clayton [2023] NSWSC 399 Devereaux-Warnes v Hall (No 3) (2007) 35 WAR 127 Galati v Deans [2023] NSWCA 13 Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490 In Re Allen [1922] NZLR 218 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 Mahoney v Lindsay (1980) 55 ALJR 118; 33 ALR 601 Muschinski v Dodds (1985) 160 CLR 583 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Sidhu v Van Dyke (2014) 251 CLR 505 Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 236 CLR 272 Zhu v Treasurer of NSW (2004) 218 CLR 530 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Christine Gay Knoll Defendant: Suzanne Lee Buxton Cross Claimant on First Cross Claim: Suzanne Lee Buxton First Cross Defendant on First Cross Claim: Christine Gay Knoll Second Cross Defendant on First Cross Claim: Corey Duncan Cross Claimant on Second Cross Claim: Corey Duncan First Cross Defendant on Second Cross Claim: Christine Gay Knoll Second Cross Defendant on Second Cross Claim: Suzanne Lee Buxton Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate