NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wehbe v Giotopoulos [2023] NSWSC 827 Hearing dates: 3-6 July 2023 Date of orders: 14 July 2023 Decision date: 14 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Application for grant of probate in solemn form fails. Declaration to be made that the deceased died intestate. Grant of administration to be made. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – contested probate – validity of will propounded by plaintiffs – whether the will was duly executed in accordance with s 6 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) – whether suspicious circumstances attended the preparation and execution of the will – whether the testator signed the will with knowledge and approval of its contents – where no evidence given by independent witnesses to the preparation and execution of the will – lack of acceptable evidence that attesting witnesses signed the will in the presence of the testator – due execution of the will not established – suspicious circumstances attended the preparation and execution of the will – plaintiffs failed to discharge burden of showing that the testator signed the will with knowledge and approval of its contents – application for grant of probate in solemn form of the will dismissed Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Alexakis v Masters (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 509 Burnside v Mulgrew; Re the Estate of Doris Grabrovaz [2007] NSWSC 550 In the Will of Kimbell [1969] 1 NSWR 414; (1968) 88 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 614 Lewis v Lewis (2021) 105 NSWLR 487; [2021] NSWCA 168 Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 Sullivan v Mouglalis; Wilson v Mouglalis – Estate Late Willem Wyma [2008] NSWSC 1326 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757; [2012] NSWCA 285 Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Paul Wehbe (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant– self represented and on behalf of the Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Simon Charbel Wehbe (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Marcha Giotopoulos (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J E F Brown (Defendant/Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate