NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Anderson v Gold Emporium Pty Ltd t/a Cordony Constructions (No 2) [2023] NSWCATCD 43 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 06 April 2023 Decision date: 06 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) a hearing in respect of the application for miscellaneous matters filed by the applicants on 9 February 2023 is dispensed with. (2) The applicants' application for a money order in place of order 1 made on 21 June 2022 is dismissed. (3) The applicants are to pay the respondent's costs of the application as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) s 48O – Order that the respondent carry out work to rectify building defects – Application for substitution with an order for the payment of money – Tribunal has no jurisdiction to revisit orders once made except in the narrow circumstances provided by s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW). ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – Application to substitute an order for the payment of money instead of an order for the carrying out of work – Tribunal has no jurisdiction to vary orders once made except for obvious errors in the text of a notice of a decision or a statement of reasons (pursuant to s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act). Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Anderson v Gold Emporium Pty Ltd t/a Cordony Constructions [2022] NSWCATCD 110 Gold Emporium Pty Ltd t/as Cordony Constructions v Anderson [2023] NSWCATAP 7 Jayasooriah v Wisdom Properties Group Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAP 81 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; 209 CLR 597 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Mark Anderson and Kathy Anderson (applicants) Gold Emporium Pty Ltd t/a Cordony Constructions (respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Kent (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate