NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Eastern High Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2023] NSWLEC 1383 Hearing dates: 19, 20 April 2023 Date of orders: 20 July 2023 Decision date: 20 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Development application DA0101/22 seeking consent for demolition of the existing structures and construction of a multi dwelling housing development with four dwellings, basement parking and associated works at 15 Boyd Street, Turramurra (Lot 1 in DP 27304) is determined by the refusal of consent. (3) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1, G, and C. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION — proposed multi dwelling housing development of four dwellings over basement car park – whether the proposed use is characterised as a residential flat building, prohibited development– whether the request to vary the lot size and frontage standard should be upheld – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 1.4, 4.15, 8.9, 39 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015, cll 4.6, 6.6 Cases Cited: Baron Corporation Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney (2019) 243 LGERA 338; [2019] NSWLEC 61 Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd (2013) 201 LGERA 116; [2013] NSWLEC 147 Hrsto v Canterbury City Council (No 2) (2014) 204 LGERA 148; [2014] NSWLEC 121 Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118 Katerinis v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1479 Level 1 Construction Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2021] NSWLEC 1405 Mount Annan 88 Pty Ltd v Camden Council [2016] NSWLEC 1072 Texts Cited: Ku-ring-gai Community Participation Plan 2020 Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 2015 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eastern High Pty Ltd (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Smith (Applicant) G Farland (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate