NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hanna v R [2023] NSWCCA 182 Hearing dates: 10 July 2023 Decision date: 26 July 2023 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Yehia J at [106]; Weinstein J at [107] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – appeal against conviction – applicant stood trial on nine counts of sexual offending in respect of the same complainant many years ago – jury returned three guilty and six not guilty verdicts – whether convictions should be set aside on the basis of inconsistency – where there was a ready explanation for not guilty verdicts, in light of unclear evidence of complainant's age at the time – whether convictions were unreasonable – various inconsistencies in evidence – whether open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of applicant's guilt – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 66C, 61H, 61HA, 61M, 77, 80AE, 578A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 159, 293, 294 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 38 Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: AJ v R [2022] NSWCCA 136 Chidian v The Queen (1991) 171 CLR 432; [1991] HCA 4 Collins v R [2020] NSWCCA 198 Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25; 96 ALJR 728 Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Gayle (2019) 100 NSWLR 155; [2019] NSWCA 172 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 250; [1998] HCA 68 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 56 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 NW v R [2023] NSWCCA 134 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 R v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 TK v R (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Walker v R [2019] NSWCCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Abdallah Hanna (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC and P Kondich (Applicant) E Nicholson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate