NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TM v R [2023] NSWCCA 185 Hearing dates: 5 July 2023 Date of orders: 26 July 2023 Decision date: 26 July 2023 Before: Payne JA at [1] Stern JA at [2] Yehia J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal upheld. (3) Quash the sentence imposed by the District Court on 24 March 2023. (4) Impose a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 9 months commencing on 16 December 2022 and expiring on 15 September 2023, with an additional term of 2 years and 3 months imprisonment, expiring on 15 December 2025. (5) The applicant is first eligible for release to parole on 15 September 2023. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against sentence — Sentencing of children — Relevant principles of sentencing — Where 15-year-old commits serious offence of aggravated robbery causing grievous bodily harm — Where moral culpability reduced as a result of a young age and a deprived and disadvantaged background — Where the weight afforded general deterrence moderated — Strong evidence of rehabilitation — Where judge erred in failing to have regard to youth in assessing moral culpability — Where judge erred in failing to have regard to youth in assessing the weight to be afforded to general deterrence — Emphasis on rehabilitation — Errors established — Resentence Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3(1), 6, 15A, 17, Div 4 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 32(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 96, 97(1) Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159; (2010) 201 A Crim R 379 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Camilleri v R [2023] NSWCCA 106 DS v R; DM v R (2022) 109 NSWLR 82; [2022] NSWCCA 156 JA v R [2021] NSWCCA 10 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 Lee v R [2016] NSWCCA 146 Li v R [2023] NSWCCA 112 Miller v R [2015] NSWCCA 86 MS2 v The Queen [2005] NSWCCA 397; (2005) 158 A Crim R 93 MW v R [2010] NSWCCA 324 Newtown v R [2009] NSWCCA 128 Porter v R [2019] NSWCCA 117 R v Eaton [2023] NSWCCA 125 R v Elliott and Blessington [2006] NSWCCA 305 R v Hearne [2001] NSWCCA 37; (2001) 124 A Crim R 451 R v KS (No 1) [2023] NSWSC 696 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 R v Osenkowski (1982) 5 A Crim R 394 R v Valencia Valencia (No 3) [2023] NSWSC 780 RCW v R (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 190; (2014) A Crim R 541 Sarhene v R [2022] NSWCCA 79 Category: Principal judgment Parties: TM (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Quilter (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate