NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Shell Energy Operations No 2 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 169 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 27 July 2023 Decision date: 27 July 2023 Before: Kirk JA; Adamson JA; Griffiths AJA Decision: (1) The appellant's motion filed on 5 June 2023 is dismissed with costs. (2) Set aside Order 1 made by the Court below on 12 August 2022, as varied by Order 1(a) made by that Court on 25 August 2022. (3) Pursuant to s 101(1)(d) of the Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW), remit the matter to the appellant for determination on the basis that the dutiable value of the acquisition is $2,946,300. (4) The appellant is to pay 90% of the respondent's costs of the appeal, up to and including 22 March 2023, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS — Court of Appeal — Motion to re-open — UCPR r 36.16 — Whether the Court addressed an argument said to have been raised — Meaning of "land holdings" employed in s 155 of the Duties Act — Whether the interests held were "land holdings" or "goods" — Where argument characterised the items as fixtures — Argument that chattels sitting on the land were "land holdings" even if not fixtures not raised — Where argument is not raised by the notice of appeal then clear terms raising distinct and additional points is required Legislation Cited: Duties Act 1997 (NSW), ss 147, 147A, 155 Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW), s 101(1)(d) Cases Cited: Banque Commerciale SA v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279; [1990] HCA 11 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Shell Energy Operations No 2 Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 113 SPIC Pacific Hydro Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2021) 113 ATR 24; [2021] NSWSC 395 TEC Desert Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (2010) 241 CLR 576; [2010] HCA 49 Vopak Terminals Australia Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (2004) 12 VR 351; [2004] VSCA 10 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate