NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Heness v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWCATAD 206 Hearing dates: 11 May 2023 Date of orders: 02 August 2023 Decision date: 02 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: (1) The respondent's decision is set aside. (2) The Applicant is granted a category AB firearms licence. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - firearms – threatening behaviour – AVOs – passage of time – character references - fit and proper person – public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Firearms Act 1996 Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321; 94 ALR 11; 64 ALJR 462; 21 ALD 1 Barlow v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor and Others (1995) 131 ALR 657 Constantin v Commissioner of Police [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Davos v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADT 7 Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith (1991) 1 VR 63 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60 Esterman v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 70 FD v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2008] NSWADT 88 Hughes & Vale Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Joseph v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCA 31 Kocic v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (2014) 88 NSWLR 159 Lynch v Commissioner of Police (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 43 Petas v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2013] NSWADT 137 Saxby v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 275 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board [1979] 22 SASR 70 Vella v Commissioner of Police [2003] NSWADT 91 Wiltshire v Commissioner of Police [2005] NSWADT 75 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Grant Heness (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mainstone Lawyers (Applicant) McCullough Robertson Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00377953 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate