NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Bigatton (No 3) [2023] NSWDC 291 Hearing dates: 31 July, 1, 2 August 2023 Decision date: 04 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: Accused's application to quash Count 2 of the indictment dated 4 April 2023 dismissed. Catchwords: Financial services – financial product advice – application to quash indictment – rule against duplicity Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 23 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 911B(1)(a)-(d), 1311(1), 761F, 761FA Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 17 Ch 2 Liquor Licensing Act 1977 (South Australia) Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Monarch FX Group Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1387 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Oxford Investments (Tasmania) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 980 Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 [2001] HCA 67. Director of Public Prosecutions v Merriman [1973] AC 584 Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467 Montgomery v Stewart (1967) 116 CLR 220, [1967] HCA 11 R v Fenwick (1953) 54 SR (NSW) 147 R v Gian (1999) 104 A Crim R 416 R v Moussad (1999) 152 FLR 373 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) John Louis Anthony Bigatton (Accused) Representation: Counsel: A Williams (Crown) with M Clifford-O'Sullivan C Parkin (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate