NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dunn v The Trustee of the Lazic Family Trust [2023] NSWDC 296 Hearing dates: 26 July 2023 Date of orders: 26 July 2023 Decision date: 26 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: 1. The amended notice of motion filed in court today be dismissed. 2. The plaintiff pay Paul Rojas' costs of that motion. 3. Any stay that is currently in place in relation to the costs orders ordered by Wilson J on 18 May 2023 is dissolved. Catchwords: Costs order against legal practitioner – circumstances for which a legal practitioner is responsible Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 [NSW] s 99(1) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014, cl 4, sch 2 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 4.2 Category: Costs Parties: Murray Dunn (first plaintiff) Kate Dinyes (second plaintiff) Optima Constructions Pty Ltd (ACN 006 026 599) as Trustee for the Lazic Family Trust t/as Optima Windows (first defendant) Elvis Anthony Lazic (second defendant) Joco Lazic (third defendant) Andjelka Lezic (fourth defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Campbell (plaintiffs) Dr J Lucy (defendants)
Solicitors: Rivera Legal (plaintiffs) Rostron Carlyle Rojas Lawyers (defendants) File Number(s): 2021/194121 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate