NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bingham v Bevan [2023] NSWCA 186 Hearing dates: 3 August 2023 Date of orders: 3 August 2023 Decision date: 03 August 2023 Before: Griffiths AJA Decision: (1) On the giving of an undertaking to the Court through his senior counsel that the respondent to the notice of motion will not take any steps to enforce orders 2(b) and 4 of the orders made on 5 May 2023 pending the final determination of the proceedings in the High Court, the notice of motion filed on 2 June 2023 be dismissed. (2) The applicant on the notice of motion pay the respondent's costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Court of Appeal – Stay of orders – Stay pending application for special leave to appeal to High Court – No exceptional circumstances – No substantial prospects of leave being granted – No risk of losing subject matter of appeal – Balance of convenience - Stay not granted Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform General Rules 2015 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: 123 259 932 Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 89 Bingham v Bevan [2022] NSWCA 248 Bingham v Bevan [2023] NSWCA 86 Calandra v Murden [2015] NSWCA 231 Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681; [1986] HCA 84 Rinehart v Welker (2012) 83 NSWLR 347; [2012] NSWCA 1 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: John David Bingham (Appellant) Christopher John Bevan (Respondent/Applicant on motion) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate