NSW Caselaw
Children's Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jai [2023] NSWChC 9 Hearing dates: 14 July 2023 Date of orders: 14 July 2023 Decision date: 21 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Children's Magistrate Hayes Decision: Evidence not admitted. Catchwords: CHILDREN – Criminal Law – Voir Dire – Admissibility of ERISP Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Regulation 2016 (NSW) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Bin Sulaeman v R [2013] NSWCCA 283 R v Coulstock (1998) 99 A Crim R 143 Fleming v R [2009] NSWCCA 233 Khamisi v R [2015] VSCA 355 R v Phung and Huynh [2001] NSWSC 115 R v Mercury [2019] NSWSC 81 R v H (1996) 85 A Crim R 481 at 485 R v Lee (1950) 82 CLR 133 Regina v Camilleri [2007] NSWCCA 36 Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (The Crown) Jai (Young Person) Representation: Mr Brager (Prosecutor) Ms Ozer (Young Person) File Number(s): 2022/00263116 Publication restriction: Pseudonyms have been used to protect the identity of the young person.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate