NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hawkesbury City Council v The Civil Experts Pty Ltd trading as TCE Contracting [2023] NSWSC 962 Hearing dates: 3 August 2023 Decision date: 17 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Ball J Decision: (1) The summons be dismissed with costs; (2) The amount paid into Court by the plaintiff on 6 July 2023 and any interest thereon be paid to the defendant. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Adjudication — Security of Payment Act (SOPA) — Where plaintiff alleges the amount of the claim for offsite overheads and the declaration that the claim was made under the Act were unclear — Whether claimant engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct — Notice of adjudication application made clear claim was made under the Act BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Adjudication — Judicial review — Security of Payment Act (SOPA) — Whether claim for offsite overhead costs relate to construction work or related goods and services — Adjudicator's interpretation of what "cost" means under the construction contract is not reviewable — Whether adjudicator's calculation of offsite overhead costs was unreasonable or capricious — Adjudicator's acceptance of claimant's unchallenged evidence and submissions was reasonable Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Cases Cited: Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd (2018) 264 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 4 Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Oswald Bros Pty Ltd (in liq) (2019) 99 NSWLR 317; [2019] NSWCA 317 Southern Han Breakfast Point Pty Ltd (in liq) v Lewence Construction Pty Ltd (2016) 260 CLR 340; [2016] HCA 52 Walter Construction Group Ltd v CPL (Surry Hills) Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 266 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hawkesbury City Council (Plaintiff) The Civil Experts Pty Ltd trading as TCE Contracting (First Defendant) Adjudicate Today Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Scott Pettersson (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B DeBuse (Plaintiff) M Christie SC with D Hand (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate