NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Netherwood v Hillier [2023] NSWSC 937 Hearing dates: 9 August 2023 Date of orders: 10 August 2023 Decision date: 10 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: 1 The proceedings under the statement of claim are dismissed as against the third defendant. 2 The plaintiff is to pay the third defendant's costs of the proceedings. 3 Stand the proceedings over to 17 August 2023 before the Registrar. 4 The costs of the first and second defendants on the notice of motion brought by the third defendant including the hearing on 9 and 10 August 2023 will be the costs of those defendants in the cause. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – professional negligence – where third defendant a fourth-year Orthopaedic Registrar – where third defendant and second defendant jointly performed spinal fusion procedure upon plaintiff – no expert opinion that procedure performed with less than the requisite standard of care and skill of a medical practitioner in his position – non-compliance with r 31.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Travis Netherwood (plaintiff) Terence Hillier (first defendant) Kerin Fielding (second defendant) David Bell (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Hillier (plaintiff) Ms Carruthers (first defendant) K Kumar (second defendant) B Bradley (third defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate