NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fordyce v Leung as executor of the estate of the late Robert Ho; Fordyce v Leung as executrix of the estate of the late Robert Ho [2023] NSWSC 954 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 16 August 2023 Decision date: 16 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: See [17] Catchwords: COSTS – application for a gross sum costs order – where procedural history complex, protracted, and foreshadowed to continue – where matter at hand significantly more confined – application granted Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98 Cases Cited: Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 39 Fordyce v Leung as executor of the estate of the late Robert Ho; Fordyce v Leung as executrix of the estate of the late Robert Ho [2023] NSWSC 778 Category: Costs Parties: Paul Mervyn Fordyce (Plaintiff) Claudia Leung (First Defendant) Rhodium NSW Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) The Trading House Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L D Corbett (Defendants)
Solicitors: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2022/292026 and 2022/292722 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment 1. HIS HONOUR: I decided the principal proceedings on 10 July 2023: see Fordyce v Leung as executor of the estate of the late Robert Ho; Fordyce v Leung as executrix of the estate of the late Robert Ho [2023] NSWSC 778. The parties have now provided me with written submissions on the question of who should pay the costs of the proceedings before me.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate