NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dukagjini v R [2023] NSWCCA 210 Hearing dates: 24 July 2023 Date of orders: 28 August 2023 Decision date: 28 August 2023 Before: Harrison J at [1] Wilson J at [17] N Adams J at [24] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – appeal – appeal against sentence – murder – trial by judge alone – whether mode of trial per se capable of facilitating the administration of justice for purposes of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 22A – whether accused's decision to opt for trial by judge alone attracts consideration of a lesser sentence – whether trial judge considered mode of trial neutral in the facilitation of its conduct or factored in irrelevant consideration of motive to seek trial by judge alone – whether error established – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 22A, 44 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6 Cases Cited: Christov v R [2009] NSWCCA 168 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulvihill v R [2016] NSWCCA 259 R v Martin Dukagjini (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1668 R v Todd (7) (1957) SASR 305 R v Walcott [2019] NSWSC 443 RO v R [2019] NSWCCA 183 The Queen v Rogerson (1992) 174 CLR 268 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Martin Dukagjini (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Carroll (Applicant) G Newton SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate