NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application of NSW Trustee and Guardian [2023] NSWSC 966 Hearing dates: 11 August 2023 Date of orders: 17 August 2023 Decision date: 17 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Nixon J Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The Plaintiff would be justified in selling the property at 130-132 Coogee Bay Road, Coogee, New South Wales being the whole of the land comprised in certificate of title folio identifier B/102102 for an amount of $8 million with a settlement period of 12 months. (2) The Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings be paid out of the estate on the indemnity basis. Catchwords: EQUITY – trusts and trustees – application for judicial advice pursuant to s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) – practice and procedure in judicial advice proceedings – nature of and principles governing judicial advice – judicial advice on whether NSW Trustee and Guardian is justified in selling property part of the deceased's estate – whether the Court should decline, in its discretion, to give the advice sought – whether advice in best interests of trust estate Legislation Cited: Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) s 63 Cases Cited: Application of Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc [2023] NSWSC 918 Application of Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc (No 3) [2006] NSWSC 1247 Application of Willoughby City Council (as manager of the Talus Reserve Trust) & anor [2016] NSWSC 1717 Halfhide v Beaven [2003] NSWSC 1207 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2008] HCA 42; (2008) 237 CLR 66 Re Estate Late Chow Cho-Poon; Application for judicial advice [2013] NSWSC 844 Wardy v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2020] NSWCA 169 Wardy v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2021] NSWCA 121 Category: Principal judgment Parties: NSW Trustee and Guardian (Plaintiff) Anthony Wardy, Robert Wardy and Roger Wardy (First, Second and Third Interested Parties) John Wardy (Fourth Interested Party) Representation: Counsel: A Cheshire SC with C Coventry (Plaintiff) J Needham SC (Fourth Interested Party)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate