NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Boujandy (No. 5) [2023] NSWDC 316 Hearing dates: 5 September 2022 6 September 2022 7 September 2022 8 September 2022 9 September 2022 12 September 2022 13 September 2022 15 September 2022 20 October 2022 28 March 2023 30 March 2023 28 April 2023 (directions) 7 June 2023 (written submissions) 3 July 2023 (written submissions) 5 July 2023 (written submissions) 13 July 2023 14 July 2023 18 July 2023 (written submissions) 20 July 2023 (written submissions) 26 July 2023 (written submissions) 10 August 2023 16 August 2023 Date of orders: 16 August 2023 Decision date: 16 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Montgomery DCJ Decision: See [188] Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence – Limiting Term – Penalty Hearing – Contribution of mental health to objective seriousness of offending – Contribution of childhood deprivation to subjective moral culpability of offending – Domestic violence – Firearm offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33B(1)(a), 59(1), 61 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 54D(1)(b) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 166 Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 7(1), 36(1) Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), ss 59, 63, 64, 65 Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990 (NSW), s 28 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 32 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Director of Public Prosecutions v Khoury (2014) 306 ALR 86; (2014) 238 A Crim R 251; [2014] NSWCA 15 DPP v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DS v R; DM v R [2022] NSWCCA 156 Muldrock v The Queen (2010) 244 CLR 120 Peiris v R [2014] NSWCCA 58 R v Boujandy [2022] NSWDC 496 R v Boujandy (No. 4) [2023] NSWDC 124 R v Eaton [2023] NSWCCA 125 R v Mailes [2003] NSWSC 707 R v Mailes (2004) 62 NSWLR 181; [2004] NSWCCA 394 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381 R v Mitchell [1999] NSWCCA 120 R v Pearce (1998) 194 CLR 610 Stratford v R [2007] NSWCCA 279 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) Charles Boujandy (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Crown: Mr M Paish (Crown) Defendant: Mr A Norrie (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate