NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ngo v R [2023] NSWCCA 201 Hearing dates: 19 May 2023 Decision date: 22 August 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1]; Ierace J at [116]; Chen J at [148] Decision: (1) Grant leave pursuant to r 4.15 of the Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW) to raise grounds 2 and 3. (2) Grant leave to appeal pursuant to s 5(1)(b) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW). (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — conviction appeal — where applicant acquitted of three sexual offences but convicted of a further three sexual offences — whether verdicts returned by the jury were inconsistent CRIME — conviction appeal — admission of evidence of "bad character" of applicant — whether trial judge should have made an anti-tendency direction — application to discharge jury made and denied in course of trial — anti-tendency direction not requested by applicant's trial counsel — whether failure to give direction led to miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61HE, 61E, 61L, 112 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 161, 294, 294AA Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 95, 128, 191 Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW), r 4.15 Cases Cited: AH v R [2019] NSWCCA 152 Booth v R [2022] NSWCCA 113 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Bussey v R [2020] NSWCCA 280 Cullen v R [2022] NSWCCA 63 Ganiji v R [2019] NSWCCA 208 Hamilton v The Queen [2021] HCA 33; (2021) 394 ALR 194 KRM v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 221; [2001] HCA 11 Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 Mahmood v State of Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397; [2008] HCA 1 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 R v TK (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Soames v R [2012] NSWCCA 188 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657; [1983] HCA 42 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sang Ngo (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Lewer / A Faro (Applicant) D Scully (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate