NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Koschier [2023] NSWDC 323 Hearing dates: 5 – 7 June, 21 July 2023 Date of orders: 17 August 2023 Decision date: 17 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Fitzsimmons SC DCJ Decision: The application is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – application for permanent stay – affidavit of solicitor containing submissions not evidence – application for stay following finding applicant not fit to stand trial – trial to proceed by way of judge alone special hearing – principles applicable where grounds for application include applicants impaired cognitive functioning and forensic disadvantage - general principles in permanent stay application – allegations of presumptive and actual forensic disadvantage – prosecution after earlier decision not to prosecute - applicability of prosecutorial guidelines Legislation Cited: Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 ss 54, 56, 62, 63 Evidence Act 1995 s 165B Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990 Cases Cited: Barton v R [1980] HCA 48; 147 CLR 75 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (2006) 226 CLR 256 Dupas v R [2010] HCA 20; (2010) 241 CLR 237 Gardiner v R [2023] NSWCCA 89 Jago v the District Court of New South Wales [1989] HCA 46; 168 CLR 23 Kitchingman v R [2023] NSWCCA 4 Lucciano v R [2021] VSCA 12; (2021) 287 A Crim R 529 McGee v R [2020] VSCA 146 Morton v R (2020) 281 A Crim R 307 Moti v R [2011] 245 CLR 456 Moubarak by his Tutor Coorey v Holt [2019] NSWCA 102 R v Adler (unreported) NSWCCA 11 June 1992 R v Burrell [2004] NSWCCA 185 R v David Anthony McCarthy (unreported) NSWCCA 12 August 1994 R v Edwards (2009) 83 ALJR 717 R v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; 255 ALR 399 R v Littler [2001] NSWCCA 173; 120 A Crim R 512 R v McCarthy R v Moore [2015] NSWCCA 316 R v RD [2016] NSWCCA 84 R v Tolmie (unreported) NSWCCA 7 December 1994 R v WRC (2003) 59 NSWLR 273 Strickland & Ors v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecution (2018) 266 CLR 325 Subramaniam v R [2004] HCA 51 TS v R [2014] NSWCCA 174 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Crown) Anton Koschier (applicant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Wilkinson (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)) Ms S Pararajasingham (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate