NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Su v R [2023] NSWCCA 207 Hearing dates: 14 April 2023 Decision date: 28 August 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1]; Ierace J at [12]; Sweeney J at [86] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal; (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – Attempt to possess unlawfully imported border controlled drug – Methamphetamine – Commercial quantity – Observed conduct of applicant limited to two occasions – Whether sentence manifestly excessive – Whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of or lack of discernible finding as to objective seriousness Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings Act) 1987 (NSW), s 15A Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 7 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16BA Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 54A Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 11.1, 11.2A, 307.5 Cases Cited: Bresnahan v R [2022] NSWCCA 288 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Howard v R [2019] NSWCCA 109 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Qiu v R [2022] NSWCCA 247; (2022) 373 FLR 183 R v Harris [2015] NSWCCA 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Qing Qiang Su (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Glissan KC; T Woods (Applicant) R Ranken (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate