NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CM v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Armidale; EM v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Armidale [2023] NSWSC 1000 Hearing dates: 14-16 August 2023 Date of orders: 23 August 2023 Decision date: 23 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: The proceedings be permanently stayed pursuant to s 67 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW). Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings – historical child sexual abuse – claims of negligence and vicarious liability on two different bases – delay – absence of critical witnesses and documents – whether the defendant's own conduct caused prejudice – whether the defendant can have a fair trial Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 67 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 63 Limitation Amendment (Child Abuse) Act 2016 (NSW), ss 6A(1), 6A(6) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 13.4(1)(c), 14.28 Cases Cited: Abdulla v Birmingham City Council [2012] UKSC 47; [2013] 1 All ER 649 Connellan v Murphy [2017] VSCA 116 Council of Trinity Grammar School v Anderson (2019) 101 NSWLR 762; [2019] NSWCA 292 DP (a pseudonym) v Bird [2021] VSC 850 Gorman v McKnight (2020) 19 ASTLR 181; [2020] NSWCA 20 Moubarak by his tutor Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218; [2019] NSWCA 102 O'Callaghan v Trustees of the Marist Brothers [2023] NSWSC 432 Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134; [2016] HCA 37 Roman Catholic Trusts Corporation for the Diocese of Sale v WCB (2020) 62 VR 234; [2020] VSCA 328 SR v Trustees of the De La Salle Brothers (2023) 321 IR 441; [2023] NSWSC 66 Standard Chartered Bank of Australia Ltd v Antico (1993) 36 NSWLR 87 Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore v GLJ [2022] NSWCA 78 Walters v Cross Country Fuels Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 10 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: CM (First Plaintiff/First Respondent) EM (Second Plaintiff/Second Respondent) Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Armidale (Defendant/Applicant) Representation: Counsel: P. A. Tierney (Plaintiff/Respondent) L.V. Gyles SC and D Stretton (Defendant/Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate