NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sev.en Gamma a.s v IG Energy Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1032 Hearing dates: 15 August 2023 Decision date: 31 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Ball J Decision: Summons be dismissed with costs Catchwords: MORTGAGES AND SECURITIES — Where defendant has not repaid money owing under credit facility and administrators are appointed to defendant — Whether defendant must execute a general security deed under a clause of credit agreement — Security deed would be void unless entered into under an order of the Court under s 437D(2)(c) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — Plaintiff has not proved that the defendant entering the security deed would benefit the company as a whole or creditors generally CONTRACTS — Formation — Uncertainty — Whether promise to provide "any adequate" security in credit agreement is sufficiently certain to be enforceable — Credit agreement does not identify the secured property, circumstances it may be exercised and the rights that attach to its exercise Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Biotechnology Australia v Pace (1988) 15 NSWLR 130 Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v Dorcon Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1988) 92 FLR 197; 14 ACLR 201 Jardio Holdings Pty Ltd v Dorcon Constructions Pty Ltd (1984) 3 FCR 311 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 72 May & Butcher Ltd v The King [1934] 2 KB 17 Pakenham Upper Fruit Co Ltd v Crosby [1924] HCA 55; (1924) 35 CLR 386 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1; [1998] HCA 30 Re Connelly (Liquidator), Samgris Resources Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] FCA 1814 Roberts v Investwell Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] NSWCA 134 Secure Parking Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2016] NSWCA 154 Whitlock v Brew (1968) 118 CLR 445 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sev.en Gamma a.s. (Plaintiff) IG Energy Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: RA Dick SC with ML Rose (Plaintiff) A Pomerenke KC with AE Munro (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate