NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elix v Hill [2023] NSWSC 1017 Hearing dates: 17 August 2023 Date of orders: 17 August 2023 Decision date: 24 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Succession & Probate List - Family Provision Before: McGrath J Decision: Leave granted to the plaintiff to discontinue the proceedings. No order as to costs such that each party should bear their own costs. Catchwords: COSTS — where the plaintiff seeks to discontinue the proceedings — where the defendant does not consent — where the defendant seeks indemnity costs against the plaintiff on the basis that the proceedings were brought without just cause — whether the Court should grant leave for the plaintiff to discontinue the proceedings — whether the Court should depart from the ordinary position as to costs in r 42.19 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) — HELD — leave to discontinue the proceedings granted — no order as to costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cabport Pty Ltd v Marinchek (No 2) [2013] NSWCA 131 Furnish & Finish Pty Ltd v Hollands [2020] NSWSC 1593 Mead v Watson as Liquidator for Hypec Electronics [2005] NSWCA 133 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Category: Costs Parties: Michelle Elix (Plaintiff) Kerrie Hill (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Jacobs (Plaintiff) S Brennan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate