NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kalloghlian v Mitry [2023] NSWCA 198 Hearing dates: 31 March 2023 Date of orders: 29 August 2023 Decision date: 29 August 2023 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Mitchelmore JA at [2] Adamson JA at [67] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — Orders against non-parties — Personal costs orders against lawyers — where applicant was defendant/cross-claimant in substantive proceedings resolved by consent — where motion seeking personal costs order against solicitor dismissed — where case below put on basis that defence was woefully prepared — where case on appeal put on basis that lawyer omitted to advise applicant that claim should never have been defended — whether s 99 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) satisfied — whether correct test applied Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Kalloghlian v Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1071 Muriniti v Kalil [2022] NSWCA 109 Muriniti v Mercia Financial Solutions Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 180 NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Corry (No 5) [2020] NSWSC 1838 Re Felicity; FM v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (No 4) [2015] NSWCA 19 Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418; [1950] HCA 35 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1988] HCA 12 Wentworth v Rogers [1999] NSWCA 403 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Avedis Kalloghlian (Appellant) Richard Louis Mitry (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M J Neil RFD KC / E L Bartley (Appellant) M F Newton (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate