NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Haydar v R [2023] NSWCCA 213 Hearing dates: 16 August 2023 Decision date: 30 August 2023 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; N Adams J at [30]; Dhanji J at [31] Decision: 1. Extend the time within which to appeal and grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against conviction – murder – judge-alone trial – whether partial defence of substantial impairment should have been upheld – whether impairment so substantial as to warrant liability for murder being reduced to manslaughter – whether factual error in one aspect of evaluative conclusion by judge – no error established Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 133 Cases Cited: Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 R v Haydar (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 131 R v Haydar (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 159 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haydar Haydar (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Chhabra and A Payten (Applicant) E Nicholson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Hanna Legal (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2015/00095041 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Citation: [2017] NSWSC 159 Date of Decision: 31 March 2017 Before: Garling J File Number(s): 2015/00095041
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate