NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Price v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2023] NSWCATAD 239 Hearing dates: 16 August 2023 Date of orders: 30 August 2023 Decision date: 30 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Emeritus Prof G D Walker, Senior Member Decision: 1. Decision under review affirmed. 2. Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the CAT Act, publication of exhibit R2, pages 53 to 56 of exhibit R1 and the paragraphs of these reasons marked "[Not for publication]" is prohibited. Catchwords: LICENSING – firearms licensing – licence refusal – offences – self-harm ideation – mental health. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 316; Bronze Wing International Pty Ltd v SafeWork New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 42; Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADT AP 16; Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50; Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60; Hill v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 218; Kavalieratos v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 117; Kocic v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCA 368; Martin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 97 McDonald v Director-General, Social Security [1984] FCA 57, (1984) 1 FCR 354; Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10; Sterjovski v Director-General, Department of Transport [2002] NSWADT 10; Webb v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2004] NSWADT 110. Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Philip W Price (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mainstone Lawyers (Applicant) Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent) File Number(s): 2023/00125550 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the CAT Act, publication of exhibit R2, pages 53 to 56 of exhibit R1 and the paragraphs of these reasons marked "[Not for publication]" is prohibited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate