NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Claydon [2023] NSWSC 1041 Hearing dates: 14 August 2023 Date of orders: 14 August 2023 Decision date: 31 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: See judgment at [2] Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — application for judicial review — decision under review from the Local Court — initial decision by NSWPF issuing immediate licence suspension notice — appeal to Local Court — Local Court imposed a conditional licence suspension — supervisory jurisdiction — parties' consent to quashing the Local Court decision — public interest in the Court being satisfied that there is error justifying the relief sought and providing reasons for judgment — whether Local Court's error was an error of law on the face of the record — finding that the immediate licence suspension notice was invalid disposing of the judicial review application — in any case, the Local Court had no jurisdiction to partially suspend the defendant's licence — that was an error of law on the face of the record and a jurisdictional error Legislation Cited: Fines Act 1996 (NSW) s 66 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) ss 27, 54, 61D, 115, 175, 224, 225, 267, 268, 270 Road Transport (Driver Licencing) Regulation 2017 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 69 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 36.1, 36.1A Cases Cited: Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care v Lambert (2009) 74 NSWLR 523; [2009] NSWCA 102 Jardin v Metcash Ltd [2011] NSWCA 409; (2011) 214 IR 448 Kovalev v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 100 FCR 323; [1999] FCA 557 Mackey v CIC Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2015] NSWSC 505 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Transport for NSW v Clayton [2021] NSWSC 16 Wilson v Roads and Traffic Authority [2002] NSWSC 645 Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470; [1941] HCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Plaintiff) Jesse James Claydon (First Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Wherrett (Plaintiff) J Claydon (Litigant in person) (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate