NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: JPM v R [2023] NSWCCA 220 Hearing dates: 17 July 2023 Date of orders: 1 September 2023 Decision date: 01 September 2023 Before: Ward ACJ at [1]; Garling J at [211]; Wilson J at [234] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. Appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeals against conviction – Incompetence of counsel – Whether defence counsel failed to put defence to jury properly – Whether the applicant was not properly advised of giving evidence – Whether there was a miscarriage of justice Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61KD, 61KF, 319, 323, 578A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5, 5F, 6, 7 Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW), s 7 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 38, 88, 90, 138 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: AK v R [2022] NSWCCA 175 Ali v R [2005] HCA 8; (2005) 79 ALJR 662 Alkhair v R [2016] NSWCCA 4; (2016) 255 A Crim R 419 Alramadan v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 322 AW v R [2023] NSWCCA 92 BQ v R [2023] NSWCCA 34 Craig v The Queen (2018) 264 CLR 202; [2018] HCA 13 Davis v R [2017] NSWCCA 257 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131; (2012) 223 A Crim R 22 Hanna v R [2022] NSWCCA 7 Hofer v The Queen [2021] HCA 36; (2021) 291 A Crim R 114 Krishna v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318 La Rocca v R [2021] NSWCCA 116 Madden v R [2022] NSWCCA 196 Nguyen v R [2022] NSWCCA 126 Nudd v The Queen [2006] HCA 9; (2006) 162 A Crim R 301 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Roach v R [2019] NSWCCA 160; (2019) 344 FLR 429 Saunders v R [2022] NSWCCA 273 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124; [2002] HCA 46 Tomlinson v R (2022) 107 NSWLR 239; [2022] NSWCCA 16 WX v R (2020) 102 NSWLR 467; [2020] NSWCCA 142 Xie v R [2021] NSWCCA 1; (2021) 386 ALR 371 Zhou v R [2021] NSWCCA 278 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JPM (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Coady, K Prince (Applicant) J Styles (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate