NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Briscoe-Hough v Edward River Council [2023] NSWIRComm 1091 Hearing dates: 5 September 2023 Date of orders: 5 September 2023 Decision date: 05 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Industrial Relations Commission Before: Chief Commissioner Constant, Commissioner Sloan and Commissioner Webster Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: APPEAL – leave to appeal – principles to apply – whether appeal raises substantial issues of principle or law, or issues having any wider application than to the parties themselves – appeal against decision not to extend time – date of termination of employment - exercise of discretion - leave to appeal refused Legislation Cited: Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) ss 334, 351(1), 377 Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) s 188 Cases Cited: House v King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory James Briscoe-Hough (appellant) Edward River Council (respondent) Representation: Advocates: G Briscoe-Hough (appellant, self-represented) S McIntosh (counsel for the respondent)
Solicitors: Russell Kennedy Lawyers (respondent) File Number(s): 2023/180979 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales Citation: [2023] NSWIRComm 1046 Date of Decision: 16 May 2023 Before: Commissioner Muir File Number(s): 2023/41599
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate