NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Graham v Peabody Energy Australia Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1087 Hearing dates: 23 August 2023 Date of orders: 23 August 2023 Decision date: 23 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: 1. The motion is dismissed. 2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Medical examinations – claim for work injury damages – where defendant seeks orders that the plaintiff attend a further psychological examination – r 23.4 of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – whether the further examination is reasonable in all the circumstances – whether further examination of the plaintiff will be injurious to his health – motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 58 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 23.4, 23.5 Cases Cited: Chopra v State of NSW (South Western Sydney Local Health District) [2023] NSWCA 142 Hill v Sydney Night Patrol & Inquiry Co Pty Ltd t/as SNP Security [2021] NSWSC 1425 JKZ v The Scots College [2018] NSWSC 1526 Plaintiff [name withheld] v Stapleton [2017] NSWSC 914 Rowlands v State of New South Wales (2009) 74 NSWLR 715; [2009] NSWSC 136 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Sidney Allan Graham (Plaintiff) Peabody Energy Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E Welsh (Plaintiff) L King SC (Defendant)
Solicitors: Brydens Lawyers Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Hicksons Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2021/343929 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate