NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gemi Investors Pty Limited v Cetin [2023] NSWSC 1099 Hearing dates: 6-10 and 23 February 2023 Date of orders: 12 September 2023 Decision date: 12 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Williams J Decision: See orders at [153]. Catchwords: LOAN AND GUARANTEES – where lender sought to enforce charging clause in guarantees against guarantors' interests in certain property owned by the guarantors and two other persons as joint tenants – where guarantors alleged they had not signed the loan agreement and guarantees and that the signatures appearing to be theirs were forgeries – where guarantors failed to disclose their onus of proving forgery – where no other ground of opposition raised to lender's claim for order under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) appointing trustees for sale of property on statutory trust for sale – order made. Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 66F, 66G, 66H Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 127 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74MA Cases Cited: Bluemine Pty Ltd (in liq) v AKA (Civil) Pty Ltd; Earth Civil Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v AKA (Civil) Pty Ltd; Diamondwish Pty Ltd (in liq) v Ivana Cassaniti; Rackforce Pty Ltd (in liq) v Ivana Cassaniti; RCG CBD Pty Limited (in liq) v Borg Family Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 160 Boyd v Thorn (2017) 96 NSWLR 390; (2017) 18 BPR 37,101; [2017] NSWCA 210 Chaudhary v Chaudhary [2016] NSWSC 1423 Damjanovic v York Agencies Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 22 Ferella v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2015] NSWCA 411 Foundas v Arambatzis [2020] NSWCA 47 Hogan v Baseden (1997) 8 BPR 15,723 Jagatramka v Wollongong Coal Limited [2021] NSWCA 61 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361; (2011) 85 ALJR 533; (2011) 276 ALR 375; [2011] HCA 11 Pascoe v Dyason [2011] NSWSC 1217 Re Colorado Products Pty Ltd (in prov liq) (2014) 101 ACSR 233; [2014] NSWSC 789 Vacation Club Ltd v A GG Properties Pty Ltd (2019) 19 BPR 39,799; [2019] NSWSC 1357 Warner v Hung; In the matter of Bellpac Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liquidation) (No. 2) (2011) 297 ALR 56; [2011] FCA 1123 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Williams v Legg (1993) 29 NSWLR 687; (1993) NSW ConvR 55-670 Woodson (Sales) Pty Ltd v Woodson (Australia) Pty Ltd (1996) 7 BPR 14,685 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gemi Investors Pty Ltd (ACN 626 991 213) (Plaintiff) Rahmi Cetin (First Defendant) Nurten Cetin (Second Defendant) Mehmet Cetin (Third Defendant) Sevda Cetin (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr H W Somerville (Plaintiff) Mr M B Evans (First and Second Defendants) Mr T Tarmo (Solicitor) (Third and Fourth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate