NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kingsley Securities Pty Ltd v Weng [2023] NSWSC 1110 Hearing dates: 8 September 2023 Date of orders: 8 September 2023 Decision date: 08 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: Leave to the plaintiff for the issue of a writ of restitution to restore the plaintiff's possession of the land comprised in folio identifier XX/XXXX of the register and known as XX/XX-XX XXXXXXX XXX Homebush West in the State of New South Wales Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — enforcement — writ of restitution — writ for possession obtained against the defendants — orders made for limited period permitting defendants to have access to the property whilst obtaining imminent refinance — debt was not repaid — defendants' continued use of the land beyond the temporary access ordered was a trespass — consideration of whether sufficient nexus between that trespass and the original recovery of possession — writ of restitution granted Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 39.1 Cases Cited: Capital Access Pty Ltd v Charnwood Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1185 Wilkshire County Council v Frazer (1985) 52 P&C R 46 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Kingsley Securities Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Kai Yu Weng (First Defendant) Ke Fu Guo (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Daniels (Plaintiff) No appearance (Defendants)
Solicitors: Elliott May Lawyers (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2022/23572
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate