NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hardwicke v Paul Richards Plumbing Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATCD 102 Hearing dates: 03 July 2023 Date of orders: 03 August 2023 Decision date: 03 August 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: (1) The applicant does not owe the respondent the sum of $9,108.44 the subject of demands served upon the applicant by Bluechip Collections Pty Ltd on 28 March and 6 April 2023. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – Warranties implied into residential building contracts – Due care and skill - Compliance with specifications – Fitness for purpose – Applicant repudiated contract by refusing respondent access to complete work – Scope of work in contract not fit to achieve the purpose disclosed by the applicant – Applicant had not paid full contract price – No evidence to establish what it would have cost the applicant to achieve the disclosed purpose – Tribunal unable to assess whether respondent entitled to any further payment – Order made that applicant not liable for further payment Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Home Building Regulation 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Brewarrina Shire Council v Beckhaus Civil Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 248 C & V Engineering Services Pty Ltd v Metropolitan Demolitions Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 167 Little v J & K Homes Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 84 Mann v Paterson Constructions Pty Ltd (2019) 267 CLR 560; [2019] HCA 32 Paraiso v CBS Build Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 190 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christine Hardwicke (Applicant) Paul Richards Plumbing Pty Ltd (Respondent) File Number(s): HB 23/16256 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate