NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2023] NSWCCA 240 Hearing dates: 20 September 2023 Date of orders: 6 October 2023 Decision date: 06 October 2023 Before: Adamson JA at [1] Price J at [2] Davies J at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – recklessly dealing in proceeds of crime – where offence involved only the moving of money on one day – where offender had been to premises on six prior occasions – whether sentencing judge erred by relying on prior attendance – prior attendance informed overall assessment of criminality – where co-offender charged additionally with two drug trafficking offences – where roles of the two offenders differed for common offence and different subjective factors existed – where sentencing judge gave express consideration to issue of parity – no justifiable sense of grievance – appeal dismissed SENTENCING – appeals against sentence – powers of court – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 19AHA – where sentencing judge erroneously amended sentencing order – whether Court of Criminal Appeal can amend clerical error of another court – held Court does not have power under Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal Rules) 2021 (NSW) – application to correct must be made to District Court Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 16BA, 19AHA Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6 Criminal Code (Cth) ss 400.3(2A), 400.6 Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal Rules) 2021 (NSW) r 5.4 Cases Cited: England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 Mulato v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 282 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26 R v Clarke [2013] NSWCCA 260 R v O'Donoghue (1988) 34 A Crim R 397 R v Perry; R v Perry [2022] SASCA 51 Regina v Rick Barry Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 Smith (a pseudonym) v R [2022] NSWCCA 123 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sam Nguyen (Applicant) The King (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lange (Applicant) L Fernandez (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate