NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Woods; R v Hayes; R v McLachlan; R v Harding; R v Farnsworth [2023] NSWSC 1163 Hearing dates: 20 September 2023; 21 September 2023; 25 September 2023 Date of orders: 26 September 2023 Decision date: 26 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Yehia J Decision: Application Granted Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW — Hearsay evidence — Evidence contained in police statements — Where witness refers to statements to refresh memory — Where portions of statements read aloud — Whether evidence of previous representations read aloud pursuant to s 32(3) of the Evidence Act is hearsay — Direction warning the jury that the evidence may be unreliable — Significant forensic disadvantage caused to the accused by reason of the witness's lack of recollection Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 32, 32(2), 32(3), 38, 63(2), 165, 165(1)(a), 165(2), 165B Cases Cited: CSR Ltd v Amaca Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 320 Debresay v The Queen [2017] VSCA 263 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Phillip Woods (Accused) Brenton Hayes (Accused) Brendan McLachlan (Accused) Jace Harding (Accused) Brian Farnsworth (Accused) Representation: Counsel: D Scully SC / K Mackenzie (Crown) A Betts (P Woods) S Schaudin (B Hayes) S Pararajasingham (B McLachlan) J Stratton SC / H Webb (J Harding) A Radojev (B Farnsworth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate