NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Lenior v R [2023] NSWCCA 242 Hearing dates: 1 September 2023 Date of orders: 29 September 2023 Decision date: 29 September 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Harrison J at [140]; Dhanji J at [141] Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against conviction – Inconsistent verdict – Where applicant had been convicted of two counts of sexual intercourse without consent and one count of attempted sexual intercourse without consent – Where the applicant was acquitted of two counts of sexual offences, the conduct of which preceded the conduct which formed the basis of the three convictions – Whether the verdicts of guilty were inconsistent with the verdicts of acquittal Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61I, 61KC(a), 344A(1) and 578A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5(1), 6 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 293A Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 38(1)(a) Cases Cited: Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25; (2022) 96 ALJR 728 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439; [1997] HCA 56 Krishna v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2007] NSWCCA 318; (2007) 178 A Crim R 220 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 Mason v R (No 2) [2015] NSWCCA 325 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 ML v R [2015] NSWCCA 27 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 R v RAT [2000] NSWCCA 77; (2000) 111 A Crim R 260 Rasic v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 Smith v R [2023] NSWCCA 118 TK v R (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Oscar Harrison Lenior (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Game SC and G Huxley (Applicant) M Kumar and S Beaumont (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate