NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Zarshoy [2023] NSWSC 1177 Hearing dates: 22 September 2023 Date of orders: 1 November 2023 Decision date: 01 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Mohammad Eimal Zarshoy is convicted of the manslaughter of Robert Atkinson. The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 8 years commencing 6 September 2020 and expiring 5 September 2028 with a balance of term of 4 years expiring 5 September 2032. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – manslaughter – unlawful and dangerous act – guilty verdict by jury – where offence took place in victim's own home during sale of a military-style semi-automatic rifle – where offender shot victim in the leg with prohibited weapon at close range and fled the scene – offending above the mid-range of objective seriousness – where offender began alcohol and drug use at age 14 – mental health problems the result of illicit drug use – no finding of reduced moral culpability – offender not entitled to leniency given five serious violence convictions and numerous prison infractions – guarded prospects of rehabilitation although no prison offences for over 12 months considered a positive sign – general and personal deterrence significant considerations given importance of firearm and weapon laws and offender's criminal history – finding of special circumstances made – extra time under supervision needed given offender's untreated drug addiction and danger of institutionalisation SENTENCING – sentencing procedure – rejection of evidence – where offender did not give evidence -where psychological report details dysfunctional and abusive childhood – where offender previously reported good relationship with family and denied history of abuse – where offender provided untruthful and implausible account of the offence to psychologist – uncorroborated evidence of childhood abuse not accepted as a result of offender's untruthfulness and countervailing evidence – further implications for finding of remorse given continuing denial of responsibility Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 18, 33A Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW). Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 30E Cases Cited: Abbas v R [2014] NSWCCA 188 Baker v R [2022] NSWCCA 195 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18 R v Elsamad [2020] NSWSC 1372 R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381; (2002) 134 A Crim R 174 R v Papandrea [1999] NSWSC 978 R v Pennisi [2001] NSWCCA 32 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim R 369 Shedden v R [2013] NSWCCA 225 Strbak v The Queen (2020) 267 CLR 494; [2020] HCA 10 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown Mohammad Zarshoy (Offender) Representation: Counsel: G Wright SC (Crown) T Anderson SC (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate