NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kennedy Civil Contracting Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) v Total Construction Pty Ltd (No.2) [2023] NSWDC 403 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 3 October 2023 Decision date: 03 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 49 Catchwords: COSTS – building and engineering contracts – dispute whether a valid payment claim was served – successful sub-contractor's application for partial indemnity costs based on contractor's rejection of a rules offer – whether the judgment was no less favourable than the terms of the offer satisfied – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.14 COSTS – subcontractor's application for gross sum costs order – Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(4)(c) Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry (Security of Payment) Act 1999 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 59 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 14.14, r 20.26, r 42.14 Cases Cited: Beach Petroleum NL & Claremont NL v Johnson (No.2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Bechara (t/as Bechara & Company) v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294 Maylord Equity Management Pty Ltd v Nauer (No.2) [2017] NSWSC 1467 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 at 581 Style Timber Floor Pty Ltd v Krivosudsky (2019) 100 NSWLR 193 Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Nauri Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 11 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Costs Parties: Kennedy Civil Contracting Pty Ltd (subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) (plaintiff) Total Construction Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Dr AJ Greinke with Mr P Hick for the plaintiff Mr D Weinberger for the defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate