NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: YFM v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2023] NSWCATAP 266 Hearing dates: 31 August 2023 Date of orders: 4 October 2023 Decision date: 04 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Britton, Deputy President A R Boxall, Senior Member (Legal) M E Bolt, General Member Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: APPEALS — leave to appeal from interlocutory decision to decline to exercise the discretion to order that a party be separately represented under Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 45(4)(c) FRESH EVIDENCE — whether new evidence reveals that solicitor breached, or might breach Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW) GUARDIANSHIP — whether Tribunal to give paramount consideration to welfare and interests of the subject person as required by s 4 Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) — meaning of expression "welfare and interests" in s 4 Guardianship Act Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 36(2), 45, 45(1)(b), 45(4), 45(4)(b)-(c), 45(5), 62(2), 80(2)(a); cl 5(1) of Sch 6 Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4, 4(a)-(b), 4(d) Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW), rr 12, 27, 27.2 Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr [2019] NSWCA 231 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002; Appellant S106/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 30; 77 ALJR 1165 ZQP v ZQQ [2020] NSWCATAP 247 Texts Cited: Guardianship Division, NCAT Guideline, 'Representation', August 2017 Category: Principal judgment Parties: YFM (Appellant) NSW Trustee and Guardian (First Respondent) Public Guardian (Second Respondent) YFN (Third Respondent) YFO (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Flaherty (Appellant) No appearance (First Respondent) No appearance (Second Respondent) S Bennett (Third Respondent) L Hammond (Fourth Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate