NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ilievski v R; Nolan v R (No 2) [2023] NSWCCA 248 Hearing dates: 28 June 2023 Date of orders: 6 October 2023 Decision date: 06 October 2023 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL at [1]; Lonergan J at [22]; Dhanji J at [23]. Decision: (1) Extend the time in which to seek leave to appeal. (2) Leave to appeal granted. (3) The appeal against conviction is upheld and the applicant's conviction is quashed. (4) A new trial be held. (5) List the proceedings for mention at the Sydney District Court on 13 October 2023. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against conviction – armed robbery of bank – inadmissible and prejudicial material heard by jury – whether refusal to discharge jury a miscarriage of justice – whether substantial miscarriage of justice – test to be applied – appeal upheld. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: AK v R [2022] NSWCCA 175 AK v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438; [2008] HCA 8 Attorney-General for the Commonwealth v Finch [No 2] (1984) 155 CLR 107; [1984] HCA 40 AW v R [2023] NSWCCA 92 Cesan v The Queen (2008) 236 CLR 358; [2008] HCA 52 Cox v R [2022] NSWCCA 66 Crofts v The Queen (1996) CLR 247; [1996] HCA 22 Dries v R [2022] NSWCCA 33 Edwards v The Queen (2021) 273 CLR 585; [2021] HCA 28 GBF v The Queen (2020) 271 CLR 537; [2020] HCA 40 Gilbert v The Queen (2000) 201 CLR 414; [2000] HCA 15 Hamide v R (2019) 101 NSWLR 455; [2019] NSWCCA 219 Hamide v The Queen [2020] HCATrans 85 Hofer v The Queen (2021) 274 CLR 351; [2021] HCA 36 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Ilievski v R; Nolan v R [2018] NSWCCA 164 Kalbasi v State of Western Australia (2018) 264 CLR 62; [2018] HCA 7 Kwu v R [2019] NSWCCA 75 Lane v The Queen (2018) 265 CLR 196; [2018] HCA 28 Maric v The Queen (1978) 52 ALJR 631 Miller v R (2015) 252 A Crim R 486; [2015] NSWCCA 206 North Ganalanja Aboriginal Corporation v The State of Queensland (1996) 185 CLR 595; [1996] HCA 2 Patel v The Queen (2012) 247 CLR 531; [2012] HCA 29 R v Ahola (No 6) [2013] NSWSC 703 R v Dodd (2002) 135 A Crim R 32; [2002] NSWCCA 418 Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 Rogerson v R; McNamara v R (2021) 290 A Crim R 239; [2021] NSWCCA 160 Saunders v R [2022] NSWCCA 273 The Queen v Glennon (1992) CLR 592; [1992] HCA 16 Tomlinson v R (2022) 107 NSWLR 239; [2022] NSWCCA 16 Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300; [2005] HCA 81 X7 v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 402; [2014] NSWCCA 273 Xu v R [2023] NSWCCA 93 Texts Cited: Archbold: Pleading, Evidence & Practice in Criminal Cases (35th ed, 1962, Sweet & Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: In proceeding 2013/246237: Tony Ilievski (Applicant) Rex (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate