NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fainu v R [2023] NSWCCA 249 Hearing dates: 15 September 2023 Decision date: 06 October 2023 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; N Adams J at [40]; Dhanji J at [41] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against conviction – wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – complainant received knife wound in altercation involving a number of men – only issue was whether applicant was wielding knife – whether jury's verdict unreasonable – whether inconsistencies in evidence gave rise to reasonable doubt – open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of applicant's guilt – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 33(1)(a) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1) Cases Cited: Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25; 96 ALJR 728 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Manase Vehikite Am Fainu (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Smith (Applicant) M Millward (Respondent)
Solicitors: McGirr & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant) Solicitor of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/00338954 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 11 August 2022 Before: N Williams DCJ File Number(s): 2019/00338954
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate