NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bingham v Boensch [2023] NSWSC 1187 Hearing dates: 11 September 2023 Decision date: 06 October 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Peden J Decision: See [64] Catchwords: LAND LAW — Caveats — Caveatable interest — Mortgage granted as security for the provision of ongoing legal fees — Whether mortgage void or otherwise terminated for breach — Whether mortgage only secures a speculative claim to fees in circumstances where quantum of costs not yet determined and agreement not to claim until later date — Whether caveat ought be removed from title Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 41 Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bailey v Boensch [2020] NSWSC 1391 Bingham v Boensch [2023] FCA 117 Boensch v Bingham [2022] NSWSC 1432 Boensch v Bingham [2023] NSWSC 1152 Boensch v Bingham (No 2) [2022] FedCFamC2G 47 Boensch v Pascoe (2019) 268 CLR 593 Boensch v Somerville Legal Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 249 McDonald v Denny Lascelles Ltd (1993) 48 CLR 457 Somerville Legal Pty Limited and v Franz Boensch; Franz Boensch v Somerville Legal Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 267 Wentworth v Rogers; Wentworth and Rogers (2006) 66 NSWLR 474 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John David Bingham (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Franz Boensch (Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: M Hazan (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate