NSW Caselaw
NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MKF [2022] NSWCATGD 25 Hearing dates: 4 March 2022 Date of orders: 4 March 2022 Decision date: 04 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: B L Adamovich, Senior Member (Legal) Dr A M Berry, Senior Member (Professional) L Porter, General Member (Community) Decision: The application for the appointment of a guardian is dismissed after hearing. Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for a guardianship order – whether a guardianship order should be made – restrictive practices function – subject person diagnosed with severe autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy and intellectual disability – subject person is a participant in the NDIS – National Disability Insurance Scheme (Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support) Rules 2018 – whether the use of a seatbelt buckle guard is a form of mechanical restraint – safety device – not for purpose of influencing the subject person's behaviour – no need for restrictive practices function – subject person with informal supports – no decisions that need to be made by a guardian – no order made - application dismissed Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3(1)-(2), 4, 14, 14(2) National Disability Insurance Scheme (Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support) Rules 2018 (Cth), r 6 Cases Cited: HZC [2019] NSWCATGD 8 IF v IG [2004] NSWADTAP 3 P v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 579 Texts Cited: None cited. Category: Principal judgment Parties: 001: Guardianship Application
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate