NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eddings v Feros Care Limited [2023] NSWCATCD 126 Hearing dates: 16 August 2023, 1 September 2023 Date of orders: 12 September 2023 Decision date: 12 September 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Ellis SC, Senior Member Decision: 1. The Tribunal declines to deal with this application as it has no jurisdiction to determine these proceedings. 2. Any application for costs, supported by submissions (not exceeding five pages in length) and evidence, is to be filed and served within 14 days of the date of these orders. 3. Any submissions (not exceeding five pages in length) and evidence in response are to be filed and served with the following 14 days. 4. Any submissions in reply (not exceeding two pages in length) and evidence in reply are to be filed and served within the following 7 days. 5. Each party's submissions should indicate whether they agree that costs should be determined on the papers, ie without the need for a further hearing. Catchwords: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Jurisdiction of Tribunal - whether dispute involves Federal matter Legislation Cited: Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) Australian Consumer Law Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Constitution (Cth) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) Retirement Villages Act 1999 (NSW) User Rights Principles 2014 (Cth) Cases Cited: ASIC v Korbelt [2019] HCA 18 Attorney General for New South Wales v Gatsby [2018] NSWCA 254 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 1; 204 CLR 559 Australian Solar Mesh Sales Pty Ltd Anderson [2000] FCA 864; 101 FCR 1 Burns v Corbett [2018] HCA 15 Citta v Hobart [2022] HCA 16 Dalton v Qantas Airways Ltd [2020] NSWCATCD 2 Dyldham Developments Pty Ltd v The Owners SP 85305 [2020] NSWCA 327 Felton v Mulligan [1971] HCA 39; 124 CLR 367 Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12; 152 CLR 570 Gleeson v Cavers [2021] NSWCATCD 158 LNC Industries Ltd v BMW (Australia) Ltd[1983] HCA 31; 151 CLR 575 Macteldir Pty Ltd v Dimovski [2005] FCA 1528 Moorgate Tobacco Ltd v Philip Morris Ltd [1980] HCA 32; 145 CLR 457 Murphy v Trustees of Catholic Aged Care Sydney [2018] NSWCATAP 275 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28 Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 7; 148 CLR 457 Pongrass v Small [2021] NSWCATAP 314 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC Q156; 254 FCR 1 Re McJannet; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union of Employees (Qld) [1997] HCA 40; 189 CLR 654 Smith v Smith [1986] HCA 36; 161 CLR 217 Wilson v Chan & Naylor Parramatta Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 213 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Applicant – Michael Earl Eddings Respondent – Feros Care Limited Representation: Counsel: Respondent – J Braithwaite
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate